Is the flying Christ, the Frankensteinian Christ

My normal reads are like "The Skeptic's: GUIDE To the PARANORMAL (Kelly) This week I will be looking at the mythico~religious language used by Apollinaris the Younger ; "Heterodoxy" or madman ? ?

I do not really think I want to get into the representing of a demythologizing of Christ Let us start with some of the .. surrounding-Creeds:

1st, Did you know that God is way more awesome than the thoughts about Him. It does matter what you think I need to say, these are only questions (then need not be internalized) This is not some variant positions parade (it is geniunely inappropriate to think this indicates my personal preference, Ok)

Most of us do not know an awful lot about this. Creeds [Where] Christ not just a man but part of the Godhead and complete in manhood, truly God and truly man, consisting also of a reasonable soul and body; of one substance with the Father as regards his Godhead, and at the same time of one substance with us as regards his manhood; like us in all respects, apart from sin; as regards his Godhead, begotten of the Father before the ages, but yet as regards his manhood begotten, for us men and for our salvation, of Mary the Virgin, the God-bearer; one and the same Son the Christ, Lord, Only-begotten, recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons

Unfacetiously, All men except Jesus were begotten of male seed that can be traced to Adam Protestants will state, Scriptural teaching of the two natures of Christ—he was both “true God,” and “true man.” (True of Catholics too). In this creedal proclaimed with a great redundance that Jesus' is “equal with the Father.” forbids entire blocks of Churchistory By affirming Jesus' divinity, creed(al) confesses, to us God is . . . no longer strictly invisible

Now lets find out about a slight variant position I might start with Apollinaris the Younger', it seems not tobe a great departure (in a way). It is my understanding that Apollinaris TY tried to assert that Jesus possessed flesh that was divine part was not fully human.

"The keepers AND the curators of the "Heterodoxy'"

To me, I can't know; but this can't be .. why

[U]Very simply, you cannot have it both ways.[/U] The situation may well need our attention. God the man, or man the God ??? We can learn from newly spawned religion(s)eulogizing gives way to meta-veneration (e g worship) : Creeds .

What happens when we start to look at it from that way ?!?Fundementally, Its' that place unacknowledgeable by the worshippers, veneration has become a real problem. Christ is far and away the most merituous.,'Jesus' is God, mistletoe kisses, Christ is God, I say it's hard NOT to say it's true. :~ There is no other name under heaven given among .." Yeah! But , Ever the swing of the pendulum is in play. <Undoubtedly> If you have concluded He is our Personal Saviour, it is not unreasonable, the self same came as the Almighty. Can it be false and yet true, man to God or visa versa (I would like to know much more).

I may be wrong . .